I used to kind of believe plagiarism is a good enough reason to automatically dislike any work of art, but I guess I've become corrupt lol. If you fear artistic integrity is lost, don't worry coz a bunch of great films aren't without infamy, but that doesn't make them any less 'great'. It's probably a criticism worth giving to the writer if you really consider it copying and pasting, but not to the piece of work itself I think. It really doesn't make it any less good if you ask me. I watched City on Fire far too long ago, so my memory is a bit hazy at this point. Reservoir Dogs used to be one of my favourites, until I later found out it was a shameless rip-off of a Hong Kong film called City on Fire, which I later watched myself to confirm it.ĭo you mean knowing that the film most definitely plagiarizes City on Fire makes it inherently less artistically merited? Does it take away the good experience? Master & Commander: The Far Side of the World The Lord of the Rings trilogy (Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King) *Will be comprised of primarily live action, but will include some cartoons/Western animation and one anime tooĦ.) What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962)Ĩ.) Sen to Chihiro no Kamikakushi/Spirited Away (2001)
0 kommentar(er)
